Azimut
Claude, from Anthropic, has earned a place in many companies for its quality with long documents, document analysis and coding. If your technical or legal team already uses it, the question is whether to buy Claude for the whole company or put in place a work layer that uses Claude, and other models, with the company's context and governance. Azimut does the latter: Anthropic is one of its four providers.
First things first: Azimut uses Anthropic's models
Just like with OpenAI, this isn't a choice between Claude and Azimut. Azimut accesses Anthropic's models under an enterprise contract, without your data being used for training, and offers them alongside OpenAI, Google and Mistral so each team can choose the model per task. What's being compared here is buying one provider's assistant versus an independent work layer that includes it.
What Claude offers for businesses
Anthropic sells Claude Team, for teams of 2 to 150 people, with a shared workspace, admin controls and standard or "premium" seats with more capacity. And Claude Enterprise, custom-priced, for larger organizations, with more controls, identity integration and larger context windows. Both give access to Anthropic's models and to shared projects with documents and instructions.
It's a sensible purchase for teams that work mainly with documents and code, that value Claude's reasoning quality, and that don't need to connect their internal systems or switch between providers.
Where the difference is
The best model for each task
Claude excels at some tasks and other models excel at others, and that changes with every new version. Companies already use more than three different models on average, and leadership in enterprise spend has rotated twice in three years. Azimut lets the legal team use Claude for contracts, the data team use a different model for high-volume queries, and marketing use a third one, without switching tools and without depending on a single provider staying the best. More in why models rotate.
Company agents, not team projects
Claude's projects share documents and instructions within a team. An Azimut agent is published company-wide, with permissions, with its tools and sources connected, and it doesn't depend on the model it was built with: if it makes sense to switch it tomorrow, the agent stays the same for whoever uses it.
The company's context, with its permissions
Uploading documents to a project works until there are hundreds of documents, they change every week, and not everyone can see them. Azimut connects internal repositories and work systems, inherits permissions from the source and keeps the context current, so every person and every agent sees only what's theirs to see.
Visible, allocated usage
Azimut assigns credits per seat and shows usage by user, team, model and tool. That's what makes it possible to know which teams have actually adopted AI, and to decide with data who needs the Intensive plan.
Pricing, dated
| Item | Claude Team / Enterprise | Azimut |
|---|---|---|
| Price per user per month | Team: $20 with annual billing ($25 monthly) per standard seat; "premium" seat $100 ($125 monthly). From 2 to 150 users. Enterprise: custom pricing, by contacting sales. | Standard: €29 with annual payment (€36 monthly), 8,000 credits per month per seat. Intensive: €145 (€179 monthly), 40,000 credits. Corporate: negotiable. |
| Models | Anthropic's | OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Mistral, chosen per task |
| Data and training | No training on company data on business plans | Enterprise contracts with all four providers that prohibit training on your data; hosted on Google Cloud, Madrid region |
| Agents | Shared projects with documents and instructions | Agents and skills published company-wide, independent of the model |
| Connected systems | The provider's integrations and connectors | The company's internal repositories and work systems, with inherited permissions |
| Spend control | Flat license per seat | Credits per seat and usage by user, team, model and tool |
| Trial | Depends on the plan | 14-day free trial |
Anthropic prices from claude.com/pricing, checked on September 28, 2026, in dollars, excluding taxes. Azimut prices excluding VAT. Prices change; check the source before deciding.
When Claude Team makes sense. Teams of up to 150 people focused on documents and code, who want Claude's quality without connecting systems and without needing other models.
When Azimut makes sense. Companies of 100 to 1,000 employees that want Claude when it's the best and another model when it isn't, with the company's context connected, shared agents with permissions and spend under control.
A common case: legal and data in the same company
The legal team wants Claude for how it handles long contracts. The data team wants a different, cheaper model for thousands of queries a day against the data warehouse. Marketing wants whichever one writes best in Spanish this season. With single-provider licenses, someone loses out. With Azimut, each team chooses, the company pays for what it uses, and everyone shares the same agents and the same context.
Frequently asked questions
Do I get access to Anthropic's latest models from Azimut?
Azimut integrates Anthropic's models through its own provider layer and offers them as they're added to the catalog. Access comes under an enterprise contract, with no training on your data.
Can models be combined within the same agent?
Each agent is configured with whichever model best solves its task, and that can be changed without rebuilding the agent. The choice is made by whoever creates it, within the catalog the administrator enables.
Where is my data processed?
The platform is hosted on Google Cloud, in the Madrid region. Models are used under enterprise contracts that prohibit training on your data; each provider's processing region is detailed in the data processing agreement.
Does your team already use Claude?
Request a demo and we'll show you Claude inside Azimut, alongside the other models, on your own documents and systems.
Request a demo